I’ve been reflecting a lot today on the interview we heard
on Thursday. Specifically I keep think
about the segment where the interviewer put forth the ubiquitous idea of the
cashier that can’t make change as proof for the failure of our country’s
schools. It’s certainly not a new idea;
I’ve heard my parents and others level similar accusations all the time. While it’s very possible that individuals
such as this might have a learning disability or be tired from working all day
or be completely apathetic, I couldn’t help but wonder if this wasn’t another
example of the misconceptions that are derailing quality education.
This generation is different than previous generations in
that if you organize your life in a specific way, you don’t have to handle tangible
money. Debit cards, direct deposits, and
automatic bill pays have made modern financial management a completely
different experience. When we talk about
learning from life experiences, we have to realize that fewer and fewer
students are going to be having the experiences of receiving change or saving
coins in a jar. Plus people make
mistakes and get flustered all the time.
I’m not advocating that kids shouldn’t know how many dimes go into a
dollar, but I think it’s important to realize that certain people’s
knowledge-base is informed by more than their schooling, and that the idea of
deceptively simple tasks is completely subjective.
If we go back to my
parents complaining about the cashier at the store, they see the next
generation as severely behind. But if
they need help with anything involving computers, they automatically go to the
youngest person in the room. No matter
how simple or intuitive some task might be, no matter how clear the
instructions or how thorough the help functions, I know a lot of older people
who just can never work a computer without assistance. They might say that it’s because computers
weren’t around when they were younger, but couldn’t I just come back and say
that their educations weren’t good enough and that their generation has no
motivation?
One of the problems with educating people is that they’re
just as motivated (maybe more so) by embarrassment, shame, and fear. Instead of helping the confused cashier, our
society points at him for his deficiency, whereas the elder technophobe
convinces himself that because he hasn’t acquired a skill, it is too complex or
beyond learning. High-stakes testing
furthers this idea about learning; when a student fails, it’s not seen as a
teachable moment or chance for growth—people just condemn them and blame them
for everything wrong with the world. If
the climate of society were different…if there was less judgment and more
patience, adults and students alike would be more open to school and
learning. For our culture to grow, we
should make students safer from superiority, condescension, and humiliation. Instead of just pointing and saying, “What’s
wrong with you?” when people don't know things, wouldn’t it be more helpful to just try to fix the problem,
making everybody better in the process.
How it should be: http://xkcd.com/1053/
Hey Joe,
ReplyDeleteI think you do a good job pointing out the changing importance of how certain skills evolve over time. I'm not sure, however, that I agree with your last paragraph where you state people are just as motivated by "embarassment, shame, and fear". While this may be true for some, others will withdrawal or internalize their inadequecy. Instead, I think it is more appropriate to approach mistakes as teachable moments and to move away from language and action that leads to equating mistakes with embarassment, shame, and fear.